Re Why Some Business Innovations Can’t Get Off The Ground

Posted on the November 7th, 2008 under BPM, CRM, Change Management, Enterprise Software, Value of BPR by Gregory Yankelovich

hugh2 Somebody once said that if you formulate clear and meaningful question, you have 80% of the answer. I don’t remember who said it and will not argue the accuracy of the estimate, but the critical importance of posing the right question is beyond any doubt for me.

Some years ago I came to appreciate W5 methodology for business applications analysis which was inspired by Kipling’s poem.

I keep six honest serving-men
(They taught me all I knew);
Their names are What and Why and When
And How and Where and Who.
I send them over land and sea,
I send them east and west;
But after they have worked for me,
I give them all a rest.

 

you can find the rest of the poem at this site.

Reading Andrew McAfee’s blog post aptly named “Why Some Business Innovations Can’t Get Off The Ground” reminded me about W5 and holistic approach to BPR.

It struck me at some point over the past month that I was witnessing an excellent example of why so many business improvement efforts fail: it’s not that they’re not good ideas, it’s that their not easy enough to enforce. American’s PriorityAAccess boarding procedure is a straightforward case of what used to be called ‘business process reengineering,’ and it’s also a microcosm of why reengineering so often failed. It’s one thing for a small group of smart people to study an existing process and figure out a way to execute it better. It’s quite another to then deploy that new-and-improved process broadly –  across many business units, geographies, and/or interdependent groups.

(Bold and underscore is mine).

The use of word “enforce” illustrates the failure of business process designers to ask the question which is at the root of holistic BPR methodology – “Why would people want to use/follow this process?”. Ignoring human aspects of business process imply enforcement that rarely works in post-modern enterprise. Examples of this wasteful approach are  abandon, particularly in the CRM arena. It is time to integrate creativity of application thought leadership and human (talent) incentive management into BPR methodology. 

Innovation and execution

Posted on the July 7th, 2008 under Change Management, Enterprise Software, Organizational Transformation, Value of BPR by Gregory Yankelovich

innovation_machine

It appears that an average human brain has difficulties to hold on to a concept or idea for a period of time that is a long enough to see that idea or concept materialized. Since we are constantly bombarded by never ending stream of information, many have a propensity to develop intellectual ADHD. The idea of concentrating on “One Thing” as a secret of happiness and success is widely propagated in popular culture, but in business reality it does not often generate profitable quarters.

It’s all about a change

Posted on the May 20th, 2008 under BPM, Business Risk, Change Management, Organizational Transformation, Value of BPR by Gregory Yankelovich

lget5010 homer-simpson-stupid-like-a-fox-the-simpsons-poster-card Why is it so easy to forget that IT technology exist to leverage an organizational change? I just read a blog post “IT to Business: I won’t read your mind” describing “successful” implementation of technology for nor particular reason. Why are stories like that so common?

Nothing improved because no one had tried to improve anything.  The direction had been “throw technology at problems and they go away,” but they don’t.  You cannot solve a problem by introducing technology by itself.  You have to understand the problem first.  The technology was not wrong.  The systems worked great, but they didn’t solve measurable business problems.

One reason I can think of is that IT is miscast to lead Organizational Transformation initiatives. I suppose if you hire an architect to help you with a problem, likelihood is you will end up with a house. Or a court case if you hire a lawyer. Do I need any more analogies to make my point?

The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it.

  – George Bernard Shaw

I would state that many IT initiatives could possibly produce better results without technology being involved at all.