Let’s challenge this truthiness

Posted on the April 29th, 2008 under Business Risk, Change Management, Enterprise Software, Organizational Transformation by Gregory Yankelovich

leadership-modelgif

Michael Krigsman, who’s blog I subscribe to, posted an interview with the SAP CTO, Vishal Sikka who is quoted:

Lines of business know the what and IT knows the how.

Mr. Sikka does not stop there and proceeds to talk about how this relationship should be managed. However this thought is very commonly used as a dogma which I would like to challenge.

If this is true, how can we explain all the projects delivered out of time and budget constrains, all the unsatisfied business communities, and low rates of adoption we read about in Michael’s blog? Perhaps these lines of business do not tell what they need? Or perhaps IT doesn’t have the know-how to install enterprise software or to maintain infrastructure?Â

I would like to propose that the above mentioned wisdom falls into a category of truthiness and the lines of business do not know exactly what their requirements are, as well as IT often does not have the know-how and political clout to provide thought leadership required to articulate and negotiate these requirements. The what is often in a realm of notions and wishes, which are impossible to act upon. The requirements are expressed in a form of functions and features which have very remote connections to the economic reasoning for the project. The lack of this knowledge is greatly discounted and misunderstood. The "what" needs to be figured out, challenged and probed until a set of specific business requirements is distilled which communicates why it is economically necessary to invest and how the change adoption will be managed. Perhaps lines of business have to accept ownership, responsibility and leadership for success or failure of the organizational transformation initiatives rather than "outsourcing" this responsibility to IT.

Can Microsoft re-invent itself?

Posted on the April 24th, 2008 under Enterprise Software, SaaS by Gregory Yankelovich

image010 The poor little giant had a lot of negative press lately. Gartner announced that Vista operating system is so “overweight” that it threatens to sink the company and technology and stock market pundits continue to speculate whether it can survive without infusion of Yahoo’s creativity.  Yet today the company about to release the quarterly results which likely to exceed analysts expectations.

It takes a distance of five nautical miles for a large cargo ship, moving at a low speed, to stop or to complete a maneuver, and Microsoft is a very large “ship” and there are indicators that it started to turn. There are reports that it’s Dynamics Enterprise Software is met with considerable enthusiasm by resellers and customers as the company entered aggressively in on-demand marketplace to give the pioneers of that business model a run for their money. But even more impotently, the thought leadership in Microsoft started to change noticeably.   

Perhaps the rumors of Microsoft’s imminent demise are a little premature.

re The problem with Forrester’s $4.6 billion prediction

Posted on the April 21st, 2008 under Enterprise 2.0 by Gregory Yankelovich

 Look forward Dennis Howlett, who wrote a number of enthusiastic posts about promise and proliferation of social software in his blogs, Irregular Enterprise and Accman Pro, seem to start loosing his enthusiasm for it’s value for an enterprise. At least it is my understanding of his post.