Re Why Some Business Innovations Can’t Get Off The Ground

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Posted on the November 7th, 2008 under BPM, CRM, Change Management, Enterprise Software, Value of BPR by Gregory Yankelovich

hugh2 Somebody once said that if you formulate clear and meaningful question, you have 80% of the answer. I don’t remember who said it and will not argue the accuracy of the estimate, but the critical importance of posing the right question is beyond any doubt for me.

Some years ago I came to appreciate W5 methodology for business applications analysis which was inspired by Kipling’s poem.

I keep six honest serving-men
(They taught me all I knew);
Their names are What and Why and When
And How and Where and Who.
I send them over land and sea,
I send them east and west;
But after they have worked for me,
I give them all a rest.

 

you can find the rest of the poem at this site.

Reading Andrew McAfee’s blog post aptly named “Why Some Business Innovations Can’t Get Off The Ground” reminded me about W5 and holistic approach to BPR.

It struck me at some point over the past month that I was witnessing an excellent example of why so many business improvement efforts fail: it’s not that they’re not good ideas, it’s that their not easy enough to enforce. American’s PriorityAAccess boarding procedure is a straightforward case of what used to be called ‘business process reengineering,’ and it’s also a microcosm of why reengineering so often failed. It’s one thing for a small group of smart people to study an existing process and figure out a way to execute it better. It’s quite another to then deploy that new-and-improved process broadly –  across many business units, geographies, and/or interdependent groups.

(Bold and underscore is mine).

The use of word “enforce” illustrates the failure of business process designers to ask the question which is at the root of holistic BPR methodology - “Why would people want to use/follow this process?”. Ignoring human aspects of business process imply enforcement that rarely works in post-modern enterprise. Examples of this wasteful approach are  abandon, particularly in the CRM arena. It is time to integrate creativity of application thought leadership and human (talent) incentive management into BPR methodology. 

re The problem with Forrester’s $4.6 billion prediction

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Posted on the April 21st, 2008 under Enterprise 2.0 by Gregory Yankelovich

 Look forward Dennis Howlett, who wrote a number of enthusiastic posts about promise and proliferation of social software in his blogs, Irregular Enterprise and Accman Pro, seem to start loosing his enthusiasm for it’s value for an enterprise. At least it is my understanding of his post.

ROI on Learning

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Posted on the April 8th, 2008 under BPM, Organizational Transformation, Value of BPR by Gregory Yankelovich

knowledge economy If you read this, you are probably a member of “Knowledge Economy”. Does it make you an “expert” in your field?

 

 

Perhaps it would become easier if we start with definitions -